Iran and Ethiopia’s Security Pact

The recent security agreement signed between Iran and Ethiopia marks a significant shift in the geopolitical landscape of the Horn of Africa—a region already grappling with conflict, fragile governments, and competing global interests. While on the surface this pact may appear as a bilateral strategic maneuver, it represents something deeper: an Iranian bid to expand influence in a region critical to global trade routes, and an Ethiopian desire to assert sovereignty in a changing multipolar world.

But the deeper concern lies in what this partnership signals: a potential trigger for heightened instability, the erosion of traditional alliances, and the creation of new fault lines in one of the most volatile regions on the planet.

A Partnership of Necessity: Iran and Ethiopia’s Converging Interests

For Tehran, Ethiopia is a strategic goldmine—landlocked but proximate to the Red Sea, boasting one of Africa’s largest populations, and increasingly alienated from the West due to human rights violations and the civil war in Tigray. Iran views this as a rare opening to build influence through arms deals, military cooperation, and diplomatic engagement, circumventing traditional Western pressure.

Ethiopia, meanwhile, has grown weary of Western conditionality, especially after being criticized and sanctioned by the U.S. and EU over internal conflicts. Turning to Iran—and possibly China and Russia—signals a pivot away from a Western-led international order and a search for partners who prioritize security and sovereignty over human rights.

Fueling a Fragile Region

The Horn of Africa is already teetering on the edge. Sudan is in civil war, Somalia remains plagued by Al-Shabaab insurgents, Eritrea is militarized and isolated, and South Sudan continues to struggle with post-independence chaos. Into this powder keg, Iran now inserts itself—not as a stabilizing force, but as a player with a long history of supporting militias, proxy wars, and political subversion across the Middle East.

This new foothold gives Iran potential maritime leverage near the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, a strategic chokepoint for global oil shipments. It also offers proximity to regional rivals like Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Israel—all of whom have deep strategic interests in the region.

Regional Implications: Egypt, Israel, and the Gulf Caught Off Guard

Egypt

The most immediate concern is for Egypt, which views Ethiopia's Grand Renaissance Dam (GERD) as an existential threat to its water security. The idea that Ethiopia could now have Iranian intelligence or technical support heightens Cairo’s fears of an emboldened, militarized Ethiopian posture.

Israel

For Israel, the Iranian presence in Ethiopia—just a short hop across the Red Sea—represents another flank in the ever-widening arena of Iranian proxy activity. With historic ties to Ethiopia’s military and intelligence services, Israel could now find itself competing for influence in Addis Ababa, or worse, seeing its regional allies encircled.

The Gulf States

The UAE and Saudi Arabia, both active in the Horn through infrastructure investments, port development, and security cooperation, now face a dilemma: how to contain Iranian ambition without overextending their own resources in yet another geopolitical confrontation.

Risk of Regional Militarization and Arms Proliferation

Perhaps the most dangerous aspect of the Iran–Ethiopia partnership is the risk of arms proliferation and the militarization of disputes. Iran has long used asymmetric tactics—arming local militias, supplying drone technology, and spreading ideological influence through Shia networks. Applying this model in the ethnically and politically fragmented Horn could be catastrophic.

Local disputes—between Ethiopia and Sudan, in Somalia’s contested regions, or within fractured South Sudan—could quickly become proxy battlegrounds, mirroring the chaos seen in Yemen, Syria, and Iraq.

Conclusion: